Freeway X BenCab National Artist Collection launched
Review: Babolat Propulse 4
#WhyILove Cathay Pacific Premium Economy
Mirabell Palace and Gardens in Salzburg
On jewellery (or jewelry) photography
Bulalo with rice all you can
Posted by Dexter Matilla - - 0 comments

Nothing scientific about this but I can see Federer winning the first set, Murray the second, then Federer the third and fourth.

How they got there:

Roger Federer vs
        Igor Andreev - 4-6, 6-2, 7-6, 6-0
        Victor Hanescu - 6-2, 6-3, 6-2
        Albert Montates - 6-3, 6-4, 6-4
        Lleyton Hewitt - 6-2, 6-3, 6-4
        Nikolay Davydenko - 2-6, 6-3, 6-0, 7-5
        Jo-Wilfried Tsonga - 6-2, 6-3, 6-2

 Andy Murray vs    
       Kevin Anderson - 6-1, 6-1, 6-2
       Marc Gicquel - 6-1, 6-4, 6-3
       Florent Serra - 7-5, 6-1, 6-4
       John Isner - 7-6, 6-3, 6-2
       Rafael Nadal - 6-3, 7-6, 3-0 (ret)
       Marin Cilic - 3-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-2

This is the best form I've seen Federer in. Unfortunately, the same can be said of Murray. The Brit, however, will be playing in just his second Grandslam final and he'll be facing the same guy who defeated him for the 2008 US Open championship. After following Federer's matches so far, it's safe to say that physically, he's not feeling anything wrong but more importantly, he seems as focused as he was when he dominated from 2004-2007. And the pressure of being the first Brit in 150,000 years to win a Grandslam championship has to be weighing down on him. It's not whether Murray can win this tournament, I think, but whether Federer will lose it. Dexter R. Matilla

Leave a Reply

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Most Read

Recent Posts

Wilson Juice 100 Playtest

Recent comments

Get Recent Comments Widget
Twitter Bird Gadget